In a notable judgment upholding the principles of procedural fairness under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ), the Bombay High Court in Saurabh Kumar Mallick v. The Comptroller & Auditor General of India & Others highlighted the critical need for Internal Committees (ICs) to conduct impartial, transparent, and legally sound inquiries. The Court emphasized that while the POSH Act aims to protect women from harassment, it equally mandates adherence to natural justice for both complainants and respondents. The case involved Saurabh Kumar Mallick, a senior official, who challenged the findings of an Internal Committee that had found him guilty of sexual harassment. Mallick argued that the inquiry was conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice, including denial of opportunity to present his defense, absence of cross-examination, and lack of proper documentation of evidence. The Bombay High Cou...
Introduction - What is Third Party Sexual Harassment? Sexual harassment in connection with the workplace, isn't only limited to the workplace (as a premises) or one's colleagues (as the respondent). It extends to third party workplaces, and third party individuals like consultants, independent contractors, clients, or other non-employees associated with the workplace, irrespective of the premises where the sexual harassment may have occurred. Employers need to provide employees with a safe working environment where their safety and security is prioritised, especially if third parties are involved. IC's Jurisdiction and When It Can Refuse Under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), women can file complaints on acts that took place at the workplace even against third parties, irrespective of whether they work at their place of employment. In line with the PoSH Act, the employer is responsible for taking neces...