A persistent point of concern for leadership teams and IC members alike is the potential misuse of the POSH framework. Section 14 of the POSH Act addresses this by detailing provisions for false or malicious complaints, as well as forged evidence. However, applying Section 14 requires a sharp, uncompromising distinction between a malicious complaint and an unsubstantiated complaint. An unsubstantiated complaint occurs when the IC completes its inquiry and concludes that the evidence provided does not cross the threshold of probability required to prove the allegation. Inability to prove a claim does not automatically mean the claim was false. Memory gaps, lack of third-party corroboration, or evidentiary ambiguities often result in an unsubstantiated finding without any dishonest intent by the complainant. A malicious complaint , on the other hand, requires affirmative proof of bad faith and conscious deception. To recommend action under Section 14, the IC must establish ...
Introduction - What is Third Party Sexual Harassment? Sexual harassment in connection with the workplace, isn't only limited to the workplace (as a premises) or one's colleagues (as the respondent). It extends to third party workplaces, and third party individuals like consultants, independent contractors, clients, or other non-employees associated with the workplace, irrespective of the premises where the sexual harassment may have occurred. Employers need to provide employees with a safe working environment where their safety and security is prioritised, especially if third parties are involved. IC's Jurisdiction and When It Can Refuse Under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), women can file complaints on acts that took place at the workplace even against third parties, irrespective of whether they work at their place of employment. In line with the PoSH Act, the employer is responsible for taking neces...